Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Voters don't deserve an answer
#29
(10-13-2020, 09:49 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: It's a completely constitutional act. It's also not really new for battles over the court like this to take place: https://theconversation.com/packing-the-court-amid-national-crises-lincoln-and-his-republicans-remade-the-supreme-court-to-fit-their-agenda-147139

Seemed like a good idea back then. But that precedent happened a long time ago in quite different circumstances. In current times, I would consider extending the court to 11 a breaking of norms.

Which is why I figured you'd be opposed to such a move. It's not exactly super clean.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Voters don't deserve an answer - PhilHos - 10-13-2020, 09:36 AM
RE: Voters don't deserve an answer - CJD - 10-13-2020, 03:25 PM
RE: Voters don't deserve an answer - CJD - 10-13-2020, 04:35 PM
RE: Voters don't deserve an answer - CJD - 10-13-2020, 08:57 PM
RE: Voters don't deserve an answer - CJD - 10-14-2020, 08:28 AM
RE: Voters don't deserve an answer - Dill - 10-16-2020, 06:33 PM
RE: Voters don't deserve an answer - hollodero - 10-13-2020, 10:03 PM
RE: Voters don't deserve an answer - Dill - 10-16-2020, 06:26 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)