10-14-2020, 07:02 AM
(10-13-2020, 10:03 PM)hollodero Wrote: Seemed like a good idea back then. But that precedent happened a long time ago in quite different circumstances. In current times, I would consider extending the court to 11 a breaking of norms.
Which is why I figured you'd be opposed to such a move. It's not exactly super clean.
I am against the action. I think there should be a constitutional limit set to the SCOTUS. I have just been in a "burn it all down" mentality, lately.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
