Voters don't deserve an answer

[*PhilHos*]

(10-14-2020, 01:51 PM)hollodero Wrote: Is that so. OK, if that is close to being true (and I believe you that it roughly is) that is a point to consider in this argument.
I'd still figure denying a nominee a hearing 11 months before an election is still rather unprecedented, but I could be wrong about that too, since I did not even know the information you just gave me.

For what it's worth, I think the Republicans were wrong for not at least going forward with the hearings. Even if they ended up voting Nay and not approving his appointment would be preferable to just sticking their fingers in their ears and going, "Nananana I can't heeeeeeeeeeear you"