11-06-2020, 11:44 AM
(11-06-2020, 11:42 AM)Au165 Wrote: Yes...because they all got one vote. Why should that guy in the field have any more say than his one vote? Why do we need to artificially prop up his values because of where he lives through the weighting of his vote?
It's not where he lives; it what he does. You cannot have crowded farms.
I get the over-simplification of one person, one vote, but, it seems the framers may have not been so simple.