Argument for and against Sewell.

[*bfine32*]

(11-29-2020, 12:49 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Except when the guy replacing him is better there. 

But you don't know that he is. Sewell has 1.5 years of play in the SUC PAC-10. We do know Jonah was a stand out in the SEC and is doing well at LT while playing beside the like of Michael Jordan.

There's no debate that Sewell is the best LT prospect in this draft, but we don't need one of those. We need everything else on the oline. 

You tell me today:

You can have Sewell in RD 1 or you can have Pitts and Davis; I'm taking option 2. 

If we wind up with #1OA do we take Lawrence because he's a better prospect than Joe?