Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Argument for and against Sewell.
(12-07-2020, 01:12 PM)Au165 Wrote: Potentially Lance, Wilson, Jones (QB movement usually starts after Bowls) with the other potential guy at play here Ja'marr Chase. I don't think the crazy haul people are talking about is in play, but I do think a 2nd could be had to slide back a few picks. 

I'm usually not that big on trading back, I think it's generally way overhyped !

But where this team is now we need a ton of help across the board both O and D. If we could pick up and extra 2nd and 5th or something from a QB needy team that isn't that far below us I'd jump all over it.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Argument for and against Sewell. - Jpoore - 11-27-2020, 04:06 AM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-27-2020, 06:15 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-27-2020, 06:06 PM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 01:20 AM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 02:38 PM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 07:40 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-29-2020, 10:56 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-01-2020, 01:21 AM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 12-03-2020, 12:31 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - bengalfan74 - 12-07-2020, 01:17 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-13-2020, 09:50 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-18-2020, 02:30 AM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-17-2020, 10:48 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-22-2020, 07:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)