Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Chris Baker expected to sign with Bengals
#59
(03-07-2018, 06:43 PM)Joelist Wrote: So the Eagles actually do the legwork and acquire Michael Bennett in a trade while we look at scrubs...

Eh, if we make a trade it should be for Cordy Glenn not Michael Bennett.

Chris Baker as Xeno says here is not a scrub. He was very disruptive for the Redskins a couple years back.

As Shake shown Baker had 9.5 sacks between 2015 and 2016 and he can stop the run.

(03-07-2018, 06:54 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: Not a scrub just not a fit for the bucs....      Just because they are available now doesn't make them a scrub in any sense of the word.

1 year deal for the bengals  seems to be done.


Trumaine Edmunds at 12 or trade back and grab Mike McGinchey seems like the best route to go now if they take
Vita Vea off their board after this. But i doubt they take Vea off their board, just a 1 year deal for Baker, shouldn't.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Chris Baker expected to sign with Bengals - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 03-07-2018, 07:03 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)