As a 5th year starting QB

[kramer1]

(08-26-2015, 09:22 AM)djs7685 Wrote: First of all, they could start out 1-2 and still be "fine". Even if they wouldn't be fine in that circumstance, your wild guess of our record after 3 games is hardly an indication of reality. Not really proof of anything for you to say that since you happen to think they're going to start out 1-2 that it means they aren't "fine". That's dumb.

Andy is a decent QB that flashes great play and he gives us the best shot at winning football games right now more so than anyone else available. Who do you think we should replace him with right now? I'm no Andy defender, but seriously, what else is this team supposed to do right now? They've won plenty of games with Andy on the field, so by definition, you're incorrect.

They haven't won a single game that mattered.

I think the Chargers and Ravens are better teams. I also don't like our track record at Oakland. Given that information I can make an educated guess at 1-2. Not to mention we may not have Burfict or Johnson playing.