11-03-2019, 11:30 AM
(11-03-2019, 11:13 AM)THE PISTONS Wrote: The best I can give is IF we had a good coach, we'd likely have 3 wins now.
That is the difference between the pro and anti Zac posters. The pro fans think that even if we don't succeed right now maybe just maybe we emerge from the darkness with a better team. The anti Zac guys are like we should have just kept Marv at least he gave us six wins last year. Guess what 6-10 is as bad as 0-16 because you still are losers. Marvin beat the teams who were worse than the Bengals but seldom over 16 seasons did he beat good teams. So that means Zac actually has some upside ,as he gets experience he may improve. Can any of you actually say Marv had improved?
