08-14-2017, 11:30 PM
(08-14-2017, 11:28 PM)Whatever Wrote: Don't get me wrong, I understand your point. Og's technique is still poor. However, not every player has to be a technician to get the job done. Mike Wallace has always been an awful route runner, but he's still an effective WR. Og's performance against Tampa was ugly, from a technical standpoint, but he kept the QB upright and opened holes in the run game. He did what he was asked to do in the gameplan. If he can do that with poor technique, then he should be a solid LT if/when his technique improves.
No they don't but they have other stand out traits. Ced does not.
If he were a tough brawler with tech struggles, I'd agree with you. But he's passive to a fault.
He didn't keep the QB upright. The scheme did. I think that's a huge distinction because when you need longer plays and you are going up against a starter for more than 2 drives, you need to know your LT can hold up.
