02-17-2016, 08:41 AM
(02-17-2016, 01:01 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: If he's burning down the local convenience store, or smash and grabbing from the Best Buy, chances are he might get it...
I really don't want to derail this thread, but I just don't understand the idea that deadly force is justified if there is only a threat to property. Obviously arson can cause a danger to life, but not always, and the smash and grab doesn't. I'm just not materialistic enough, I suppose.
