04-06-2016, 03:23 AM
(04-05-2016, 07:44 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Could it be, that in "that time", most women did not work? And therefore the workforce was at a premium? And, could it not also be true that with Women essentially doubling the work force, that employers now have the premium?
No.
That is not how it worked at all. There was unemployment even before women joined the workforce in large numbers.
Wages have been driven down by foreign competition and automation. It has nothing to do with the number of women in the workforce.
