11-26-2018, 02:03 PM
(11-26-2018, 01:50 PM)fredtoast Wrote: You can't honestly look at the needs this team has and claim that it is MARVIN'S decision to not sign good free agents to fill them.
That is absurd. You are just playing "make believe" in order to try and make Marvin look worse.
Just curious, but why exactly do you think Marvin wants to lose and look bad instead of spend Mike Browns money for better free agents to win more games?
Nice try, Fred.
As I said in my Post, Marvin does not have a "total influence" but a Great enough influence to have Mike looking like a decent GM compared to how Mike looked in the 1990's.
The Bengals have been in the Top third of the NFL in spending during a number of Marvin's seasons here with the Bulk going to retaining their own players.
There have been a number of Marvin seasons where Expert Analysts from around the NFL have actually Praised Bengal Rosters for quality & depth. They have not all been as lacking as you imply.
Stop avoiding the burning question: or even TWO questions:
Do you thus assume that Marvin entered every game that he LOST with a LESSER game day Roster than the Head Coach that was opposing him that day ?
Does Mike Brown wear a Head Set during games and mess up Marvin's brilliant Coaching during these games where Marvin had the better game day Roster than the other Head Coach he opposed had yet Marvin LOST ?
Stay focused and answer these two questions, Fred.
