Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If GM holding Marvin back, then why has Marvin never left to a better Opportunity/GM?
#80
(11-26-2018, 03:10 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Knowing your boss sucks does not mean you suck at your job.

The fact that Mike Brown sucks does not mean every coach and player under him sucks.  Is every Bengal player who ever signed a contract extension to stay here just as bad as Mike Brown?

Likewise, Mike Brown's sucking doesn't mean every coach and player doesn't suck.

I get the Mike Brown hate. And I get the "God the 90s were horrible" defense of Marvin. And I get that not every player is going to be a HoF.

But at some point you have to hold people accountable for the results. It's the difference in responsibility and accountability. Marvin isn't accountable for Mike. He has no control over what the owner wants to do. But he is responsible for what Mike does. And he's accountable for his own poor coaching and lack of success.

Marvin should've been fired years ago. Hue should not have been brought back. Fans shouldn't have to put up with an acceptance of failure.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: If GM holding Marvin back, then why has Marvin never left to a better Opportunity/GM? - Benton - 11-26-2018, 03:57 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)