If GM holding Marvin back, then why has Marvin never left to a better Opportunity/GM?

[Whatever]

(11-27-2018, 07:37 PM)fredtoast Wrote: He was NFL Coach of the Year in '09. You call that "bashing"?

He received tons of praise in 2011 fro making the playoffs with a team projected to be the worst in the league.

He was credited for building a Super Bowl contender in 2015 until Dalton was injured.

Just because some Bengal fans are constantly squealing and crying that does not mean the rest of the world agrees.

Marvin doesn't give a shit about the haters.  They gonna hate no matter what he does.  If he stays he "has no pride", but if he leaves he is "quitting on his players".

Marvin has developed a relationship with his players and he likes coaching them.  He is not going to leave just because of a bunch of crybaby fans who will hate him whether he stays or goes.

He was coach of the year in '09 after being a punching bag from '07-'08.

The Bengals were predicted to be terrible in '11 largely because they massively underachieved in '10 and nobody was sold on Dalton as a franchise QB. 

Notice a pattern here?  It becomes easy to overachieve in the public eye when you consistently underachieve to lower your expectations.

Lol, who was giving him credit in '15?  The narrative all throughout '15 was that the Bengals looked tough, but could Marvin make a playoff run after coming up short so many times?  The national narrative was that Marvin had to prove he could get it done in the playoffs.

You just said Marvin wouldn't leave because the haters would give him the Kevin Durant treatment(even though he would have win something after he left to get the Durant treatment), then say he doesn't give a shit about the haters.  Those are directly contradictory.