01-19-2020, 10:54 PM
(01-19-2020, 10:33 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: This seems like such backwards logic to me. Lets keep Dalton because Mike "might" not spend the money elsewhere? By that logic, we may as well keep players like Cordy Glenn around. We may as well sign Hart to a massive extension, because - after all - Mike might not spend that money in free agency.
How about we simplify this and just say "dumb moves are dumb", and keeping a disgruntled backup around at a cool $18 million would be very dumb.
Yeah, I just don't get the logic. Sorry to anyone that supports the idea of keeping Andy around after we draft Joe, but it simply doesn't make any sense to me for all the reason that many posters have already mentioned.
