Why not keep Andy as a backup?

[*bfine32*]

(04-29-2020, 10:12 AM)spazz70 Wrote: Boy your are someone that is hard to have a discussion with...let me put it in bold this time.

IF THERE IS NO OTCS, TC AND A SHORTENED PRESEASON OR SEASON DUE TO THE COVID19 THEN ANDY WOULD POSSIBLY BE THE BETTER OPTION AT QB FOR THIS YEAR..

Is it really that hard to understand?  Any vet QB in those circumstances would be a better option.  It is not about Andy versus Joe.  It is about what is or may happen with the current situation with the season.  

I am done discussing this with you. It is a hypothetical situation and discussion and you are taking it to heart like I am saying that is what I want to happen.

I think some are letting their love/hate of Andy stand in the way of logic. Drew Bres alone has a $45 mil cap this year, they recently signed Hill for $20 and just sign Winston. But we cannot afford $23 mil for our top 2 QBs because of how the funds are allocated. It's not our money, it's Mike Brown's.
Do the Redskins now have to cut Kerrigan because he will make more than Chase? No and Haskins will be the 3rd highest paid QB on the team. Veterans make more than rookies especially established ones,