Louisville Will Erupt!

[GMDino]

(09-29-2020, 07:32 PM)Dill Wrote: Sure, but your "answers" are dodges. Non-Answers. E.g., "You need to learn how to read."

What else is "can't prove a negative" good for in the hands of someone who really doesn't understand the phrase means and when and where it applies, when and where not? Fred is spot on when he asks why the very metrics used to establish that profiling exists in a specific city/department/location could not be used to establish that it no longer exists. Its the kind of thing social scientists and policy experts do every day.

The "serial killer" dodge fools only you. Fred, Ignore the red herrings and smoke.

PS "My boy" is crushing it as far as substantive points go. I only suggest he not let the quippery distract him--keep the non-answers in the foreground as what they are, but don't try to "answer" someone who cannot produce a definition he claims to have provided.  Be ready when you start claiming that the difference between good and bad answers here is only "opinion."

Ain't it odd that when more than one person disagrees with one person it is "white knighting" "defending your boy" the "mean girls", but then they disagree with someone else it is "because they understand what he really meant".

SSF said racial profiling doesn't exist anymore (only in "history") but then says you can't prove a negative and wants to keep arguing.

No amount of proof (already offered) will change that.