The Seahawks weren't good, we just recovered from our mistakes.

[reuben.ahmed]

(10-12-2015, 11:35 AM)Au165 Wrote: Your smugness is comical. By the way Mr. "Statistical Analysis" since you want to start pointing out "facts" based on an incomplete data set and random periods, I'll point out you are incorrect in saying we haven't beaten a team above .500. When we beat the Chargers they were in fact 1-0 and undefeated. Either you have to take them for what they were when we played them, or what they are at the end of the year, but you can't pick a week and make a proclamation and call it fact. If this was the case going into week 3 our opponents combined record was 2-2 and all loses had come from us.

You can absolutely pick a week and call it fact, because it's a fact right now. You're using stats in your own argument. You're all over the place, I'm done arguing. Look at it at the end of the year and we'll come back and see how the Bengals did.

Going back to the original post, what are your thoughts on the Seahawks? They were a good test and a stepping stone for the rest of the season, but they are average or below. Their fans admit it, but can you?