Argument for and against Sewell.

[*rfaulk34*]

(11-29-2020, 01:50 AM)bfine32 Wrote: But you don't know that he is. Sewell has 1.5 years of play in the SUC PAC-10. We do know Jonah was a stand out in the SEC and is doing well at LT while playing beside the like of Michael Jordan.

There's no debate that Sewell is the best LT prospect in this draft, but we don't need one of those. We need everything else on the oline. 

You tell me today:

You can have Sewell in RD 1 or you can have Pitts and Davis; I'm taking option 2. 

If we wind uo with #1OA do we take Lawrence because he's a better prospect than Joe?

Let's just say i'm very leery on tOSU interior linemen and while the TE would be great, Sewell has the tools and potential to be a great OT and he's only 20 years old. If he didn't progress a single percent, he'd still be good. But we both know he will. 

Jonah has been good at LT but not so good that he can't be moved. 

Gimme option #1