Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Argument for and against Sewell.
(12-03-2020, 02:36 PM)ochocincos Wrote: If Warford really is still only seeking $7 mill per year like he was back last offseason before he opted out, then yes I agree. I think Warford at $7 mill makes more sense than Thuney at $14-15 mill.

I think the Thuney talk is a waste of time.  Zero chance this team pays 14 mil for a guard.  A guy in the Warford range or a draft pick is much more likely.  The Bengals have many needs this offseason, and they are all at big money positions.  DE, corner, OT, OG, even possibly receiver.  Looking at that laundry list makes me believe that the chances of them going after the highest-priced OG on the market are even less than I expected, and I expected them to be 0.  
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Argument for and against Sewell. - Jpoore - 11-27-2020, 04:06 AM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-27-2020, 06:15 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-27-2020, 06:06 PM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 01:20 AM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 02:38 PM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 07:40 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-29-2020, 10:56 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-01-2020, 01:21 AM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - samhain - 12-03-2020, 05:15 PM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 12-03-2020, 12:31 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-13-2020, 09:50 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-18-2020, 02:30 AM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-17-2020, 10:48 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-22-2020, 07:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)