Argument for and against Sewell.

[Jpoore]

(12-04-2020, 12:18 PM)Gdale_Bengal Wrote: Quinton Nelson says hold my beer.

He did not say he’s best at guard, you’re putting words in his mouth. He said START him at guard until he understands the nuances of tackle better then move him outside. A decent-good coach will coach him into better techniques and to be more aggressive with his hands. And no we aren’t getting 2 firsts and a 2 for this years 3 I don’t know where you’re getting these numbers from.

As others have said, value is right there. And it’s all about what a team is willing to give up. Bears have up what 4 top 90 picks to move up 1 spot? And no voch said he would be a better player at guard.

(12-04-2020, 02:23 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Ofc you should consider it. But when you’re talking about a prospect like Sewell you have to be blown away by the offers to pull the trigger. And those types of trades are just not that common. Especially for non-QB’s. Now if Lawrence and Fields go 1/2 and some team is absolutely in love with Trey Lance and wants to give us multiple 1sts and multiple 2nds sure let’s do it. Very unlikely though. But I’m not trading away the chance at Sewell for a single extra pick.

Agree completely on that last sentence. I need 3 top 60 picks to trade back.

(12-06-2020, 08:37 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Drafting Sewell just got a hell of a lot more important with Jonah’s injury. I don’t think there is an argument against at this point.

Don’t think an injury should change anything