Argument for and against Sewell.

[Whatever]

(12-15-2020, 03:03 PM)Au165 Wrote: I think this class is better. Sewell is probably the top guy on paper in either class. For me it's the depth of this class that is really impressive, some people have Eichenburg has their Tackle 7 or 8 (I have him as 2) but the point is most agree he can come in and be a solid starting NFL tackle potentially year 1. Hell, Dillon Radunz of NDSU was getting top 10 hype before their season got cut down to just 1 game and he is a lot of people's Tackle 10-12 right now.

I am fully confident a starting-level tackle can be had this year on day 2, which is why I REALLY want to trade down a bit and get a pass rusher in round 1, or Kyle Pitts because he could be a Travis Kelce type of weapon to our offense. All that said, I have watched Sewell, Little, Radunz and Slater tape from last year and Eichenberg and Cosmi tape from this year. I need to do more Mayfield, Leatherwood, and a few others still.

Personally, I'm not that confident that a day one starter can be found on day 2, or at least a solid one.  That's why I asked about the '19 class, because the only day 1 or 2 OT starter that was decent was Taylor.  

I think if we're going this way, you need 2 quality OL upgrades in FA, and not Spain/XSF type guys, either.