Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Argument for and against Sewell.
(12-15-2020, 03:52 PM)Au165 Wrote: Let's put it this way, last year everyone didn't really start talking about Willis from Bama until Leatherwood went back. Leatherwood may actually be a late 1st early 2nd type player this year. I personally think Sewell, Slater, Eichenberg, Radunz, Darrisaw, and Carmen are all better which means it Leatherwood could end up the 7th tackle and a 2nd round pick.

If you end up with an elite rusher, Leatherwood, and another 2nd round pick and maybe a 4th for instance you have to feel really good about such a move.

I don't think you're getting an elite edge in the 1st in this class unless you get very lucky. Honestly, I think the cost to retain Lawson is being overestimated.  PFF recently released their Top 50 FA's, which contains 6 edges and he isn't one of them. 
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Argument for and against Sewell. - Jpoore - 11-27-2020, 04:06 AM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-27-2020, 06:15 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-27-2020, 06:06 PM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 01:20 AM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 02:38 PM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 07:40 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-29-2020, 10:56 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-01-2020, 01:21 AM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 12-03-2020, 12:31 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-13-2020, 09:50 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - Whatever - 12-15-2020, 06:07 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-18-2020, 02:30 AM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-17-2020, 10:48 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-22-2020, 07:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)