Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Argument for and against Sewell.
(12-18-2020, 12:35 PM)Au165 Wrote: Anything under 34 at one point was considered "extreme". It's always "extreme" until people figure out it's not really extreme. Joe Staley in the day with 33.5 was crushed for it but ended up being an elite player. It didn't hurt Slater when playing Chase Young last year, or any of his opponents really, so I am going to go out on a limb here and say he will be fine.

Young only had a 33-3/4" arm length, though, so Slater wouldn't have been at any major disadvantage in that matchup.  I don't think it's a major thing 99.9% of the time, though.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Argument for and against Sewell. - Jpoore - 11-27-2020, 04:06 AM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-27-2020, 06:15 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-27-2020, 06:06 PM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 01:20 AM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 02:38 PM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 07:40 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-29-2020, 10:56 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-01-2020, 01:21 AM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 12-03-2020, 12:31 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-13-2020, 09:50 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-18-2020, 02:30 AM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-17-2020, 10:48 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - Whatever - 12-18-2020, 12:52 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-22-2020, 07:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)