03-26-2021, 12:24 PM
(03-26-2021, 12:16 PM)ochocincos Wrote: If I recall correctly, the Bengals' argument for not offering as much guaranteed money is that they are more likely to keep players through most/all of their contracts compared to other teams, so the total money is essentially mostly guaranteed.
But players don't like that approach, and now they are seeing the Bengals cut players early, so guaranteed money becomes more important.
dont know if that was the bengals arguement but something some of us mentioned about free agents signing overpriced contracts elsewhere is that there were extremely unlikely to see the big money years at the end. (we generally structure big money years to the front if we can from what ive seen)
