Ministry of Truth?

[StrictlyBiz]

(05-15-2022, 10:52 AM)Dill Wrote: In this case, maybe we could start with stuff people are JUST SAYING about the laptop, and then see if we
can find what evidence has actually been validated, preferably by forensic and computer professionals?

I like how you threw "by a forensic computer professional" in there as a qualifier, thereby delegitimizing any validation that may come from....The New York Times? 
https://www.vox.com/22992772/hunter-biden-laptop



Anyway, Im glad that you brought this up. We've kinda spun off topic a bit and this post brings us right back on point. 

I really don't give a rats-ass about the personal stuff on the laptop and Im kinda numb to the potential corruption revealed on it, I guess because I truly don't know how much is true and Im saving my anger for when/if it is verified. 

My concern is how the story was completely buried in the media and on social media. There was a concerted and successful by effort by Twitter and 51 former intelligence officials, who wrongly alleged that it was Russian disinformation, to suppress the story. The MSM followed suit and failed to cover it, dismissing it Russian disinformation. They all got it wrong. It was/is a real story. 

And, bringing it full circle, this is why I am vehemently against disinformation board. If a group of 'former officials' can wield enough power to silence a story, just imagine the power of the actual elected officials and those that they've appointed.