01-11-2016, 07:42 PM
(01-11-2016, 07:20 PM)Benton Wrote: I'm guessing you're joking with that one? Another team's coaches have even less to do on the field when an opponent is injured than a position coach from a different position.
As to why, my guess is because the Bengals cared about his well being. I didn't see any of them trying to pee on him or anything.
Not joking. Talking about Bengal coaches removing the Bengal players from the area of the injured Steelers player.
Do they have to? No. But given the volatility of the situation, maybe (definitely in hindsight) they should have.
![[Image: 12417656_10208481126928364_5227831409754...e=5702BE1D]](https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/12417656_10208481126928364_5227831409754156656_n.jpg?oh=0d1df9538ef5d9725bda730bcb162132&oe=5702BE1D)
