Bengals fans...

[BFritz21]

(01-11-2016, 08:01 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: I don't follow your logic here.

Doesn't surprise me.

You say that you don't have enough evidence to conclude that the refs were biased, do you follow me so far?

Then, you say that Porter being on the field illegally caused Jones to touch the ref, do you follow so far?

Yet they call Jones for bumping the ref while he was going after a COACH THAT WAS DRESSED IN NORMAL CLOTHES, which I put that in caps lock so you realize that they couldn't have mistaken him for a player and thought that he was on the field legally.

You still follow?

Therefore, they were obviously bias in calling a penalty on Jones when the flag should have been on Porter and Jones never even should have had a chance to try and shove Porter and mistakingly bumping the ref.

Let's sum it all up:  You can't say the refs weren't biased when you also say that they allowed a Steelers player to break the rules first and provoke a Bengals player.

I hope I didn't lose ya anywhere in there. 

(01-11-2016, 08:01 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: I said things that were going on. Gilberry could have been called for his helmet being off or bumping Porter, yet he wasn't. Already pointed that out. The officials let things get out of hand with their leniency, but when Jones touched an official that was it. The rule about that leaves no room for ambiguity and discretion like the others. He wasn't pushed into the official or anything, he made that decision. No one is to blame there but himself, and it's not biased.

Refs get run into all the time in the field of play.  I've seen players shake hands with refs or hug refs (Doug Martin), yet they weren't flagged.  

Sounds like ambiguity to me.