Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
George Iloka? or no George Iloka?
#14
(02-14-2016, 07:54 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Hmm, neither if you have to overpay either.

Iloka is good and makes the defense better playing compared to not playing, but as long as you keep Nelson, you can roll with Nelson/Williams and not have much of a drop off to warrant paying Iloka like he was Thomas/Berry/Weddle.

Iloka's four years can be broken down as... 1 non-factor, 1 meh, 1 great, and 1 okay. That just doesn't translate to being paid as a top safety in my mind. He also doesn't really have many big splash plays. In four years he has 0 sacks, 20 Pdef, 5 INT, 2 FF. He's good, but not great.

If he wasn't wearing a Bengals uniform and was an outside free agent instead, people would be ridiculing folk for wanting to overpay him as a top safety and "become like the Browns and the Raiders".

Berry and Thomas are Free Safeties  Weddle is a Strong Safety, just moved this year after years at Free and has about the same stats as George this year.  Free safeties get the bigger pay day.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: George Iloka? or no George Iloka? - spazz70 - 02-15-2016, 01:06 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)