Kaepernick Trade For Dalton?

[*Nately120*]

(06-09-2015, 01:36 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: Well... I did say IMO.
I'm not a homer and I did also say I didn't consider either starter material.
The higher upside that I see in Pryor is that his frame could add the extra weight to be more durable.
As far as comparing stats, I don't find that relevant as Pryor never got the shot that RG3 did.
Regardless, I defer to the fact of paying Pryor a minimal salary and being content with that investment over losing my starting QB to gamble on RG3.

Now then.......
Go AJ McCarron !!

Pryor didn't get the shot that RGII did because Pryor isn't RGIII...it's really that simple.  This isn't little league, not everyone gets the same chance.  And while Pryor did get to be the starting QB in crappy ol' Oakland his 9 total TDs to 13 total TOs (along with some games missed due to injury, for good measure) may play a role in the fact that he isn't getting any offers for starting gigs.

It's just the way it is.  I'm just calling you out for looking at a guy who hasn't shown that he's in RGIII's ballpark and claming that he may be significantly better.  Anywho, I get what you are saying, but it is a bit telling that you see higher upside in Pryor yet also state that you wouldn't want to pay him a lot and/or make him the starter.  Upside just seems like such an ambiguous thing.