Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Are the bengals really that cheap?
#7
Also underspending — as of Feb. 9, when the NFLPA calculated the numbers — were: the Carolina Panthers (80.8%), New York Jets (81.16%), Jacksonville Jaguars (82.2%), Dallas Cowboys (82.6%), New England (82.7%), New Orleans Saints (86.2%), Washington Redskins (87%), New York Giants (87.9%) and Pittsburgh Steelers (88.3%).


So I guess underspending isn't all that bad.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Are the bengals really that cheap? - GreenCornBengal - 03-04-2016, 01:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)