Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Are the bengals really that cheap?
#15
(03-04-2016, 03:04 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: It's because they wouldn't pay Dre Kirkpatrick $7.5m, or Rey Maualuga a $7m cap hit in one year, or Leon Hall $9m to be a backup player, etc.

Those teams would demand a pay cut, or cut the player and then proceed to save that money and actually use it on someone better when the opportunity arises.

What players would you have signed to replace these guys for less money?

It is not that easy to replace these type of players when you cut them.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Are the bengals really that cheap? - fredtoast - 03-04-2016, 04:51 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)