Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
North Carolina House Passes Bill Voiding All Local LGBT Nondiscrimination Ordinances
(04-16-2016, 02:58 PM)PhilHos Wrote: BECAUSE THE SUPPOSED DISCRIMINATION IS PART OF THEIR RELIGIOUS  BELIEFS

Why is it discrimination when a baker is willing  to serve gays except for when it comes to gay marriages but it's not discrimination when Springsteen is willing to serve N. Carolinans except when it comes to their religious beliefs (in the form of supposed discrimination)?

Answer these questions or STFU.

If he was discriminating against them for their religious beliefs then he would not play for them when they were not discriminating.  Springsteen has no problem with any person holding any religious belief.  He will take their money and perform for them as long as they are not discriminating based on those religious beliefs. If he was against the religious beliefs then he would never perform for these people.  But that is not the case.  he is just against the discrimination.

So to answer your question it is okay to refuse service to people who are guilty of discrimination, but it is not okay to refuse services to people based on religious beliefs.  

You just can't get through your head that it is not okay to discriminate just because it is based on religious beliefs. 





Messages In This Thread
RE: North Carolina House Passes Bill Voiding All Local LGBT Nondiscrimination Ordinances - fredtoast - 04-16-2016, 03:34 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)