05-06-2016, 01:36 PM
(05-06-2016, 01:19 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: There were plenty of people claiming Mathis was better than Livings while both were on the team. You might argue they were smarter Alexander. But as they say, hindsight is 20/20. I can look at what transpired and definitively claim Mathis is a better player than Livings and Alexander made the wrong decision. Only an obstinate fool would look at history and claim otherwise.
Livings was given a 2-4 week prognosis after the 2nd scope. That's not career ending. It's not even career threatening. That's a simple clean out. It's like changing the oil or rotating the tires. Not only is your claim Livings is out of the NFL because of injury bullshit, it's nothing but a damn lie.
Reminds me of when you claimed over and over again Joseph was too much of an injury risk to re-sign because he had the exact same foot injury two years in a row. Until I showed you it wasn't even the same foot before you STFU.
That's not my arguement at all. My argument is Paul Alexander was wrong in his evaluation; he made a mistake. Why do I believe that? Because I can look at the results and I'm not an idiot. Unlike some people who claimed a player had the exact same injury two years in a row, but the exact same injury didn't even affect the same damn body part.
You did this same crap with Bratkowski. What's he doing now? While the two OCs who replaced him moved on to HCing gigs. Instead of starting a thread questioning which retread DE the Bengals will sign maybe you could start a thread questioning which retread coach the Bengals can sign who will telegraph the plays to the defense by the formations he uses? I really miss reading those threads with you defending everything Bratkowski did, the same as you do with Alexander.
thought there was something about mathis coming into that next year out of shape.
