Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
With Bridgewater seriously injured, could there be a Mccarron trade?
#23
(08-30-2016, 09:33 PM)THE Bigzoman Wrote: We have Keith Wenning.

And I have a bag of rubber bands. Equally useful.
Really, no offence, but that is basically having nothing but good wishes.

(08-30-2016, 09:33 PM)THE Bigzoman Wrote: Which isn't saying much, but the laws of probability are on our side.

Again, Dalton has only been injured once. We're securing our future in the long-run by getting the most value we can get from him now. It's a conservative move that's consistent with how the Bengals have ran things. Why are we hesitating over something that's unlikely to happen?

Is it though?
Maybe I overlook several events, but I do not really recall the Bengals trading away an awful lot of players for picks since Carson or Ochocinco. Here's what in my perception the Bengals do. They keep players and take the compensatory pick should they sign a big contract elsewhere as an FA.

--- And I just learned McCarron isn't an FA next year. So there goes this point.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: With Bridgewater seriously injured, could there be a Mccarron trade? - hollodero - 08-30-2016, 09:45 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)