Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
With Bridgewater seriously injured, could there be a Mccarron trade?
#49
The reason people (not just here, go look on Twitter) always bring up AJM when a QB goes down is because AJM is viewed by many as a capable and deserving NFL starter.

He's behind a bona fide stud here, so he's really only good as an insurance policy. If the Bengals can get something that helps them this year, with Shaun Hill thrown in in case of another Andy injury, you have to at least listen.

But it speaks to how valuable the organization thinks AJM is that they don't even listen to offers for him. I'm sure they had plenty of opportunities to trade him if they wanted.

Denver is trotting out a no-name scrub at QB, Dallas is going to play a guy that Trent Dilfer can't wait to call "remedial" and the Vikes have absolutely nothing.

I'd wager that KC or NYJ is the team that moves a QB to the Vikings. They have extras, and AJM isn't viewed as an extra by the Bengals front office.

He's viewed as untouchable.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: With Bridgewater seriously injured, could there be a Mccarron trade? - BigSeph - 08-30-2016, 11:40 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)