(10-13-2019, 04:07 PM)PhilHos Wrote: [ -> ]You guessed his tenure? Like I said its a simple piece of information. You couldn't get THAT right. Why should I bother reading the restof your post if you cant get a simple thing like that right?
Sent from my LG-Q710AL using Tapatalk
But on the flip side, with Dalton's ineffectiveness (being nice here), how could anyone take someone still defending him, seriously?
INTENTIONAL GROUNDING!
Yes, he was out of the pocket but NO RECEIVER IN THE AREA!
That fg sums up the bungles luck right there
Another week the defense isnt great but not bad either.....but the offense cannot do anything.
(10-13-2019, 04:19 PM)Synric Wrote: [ -> ]Another week the defense isnt great but not bad either.....but the offense cannot do anything.
Looks like we,ve brought in a couple back ups
At least the Seahawks have overtaken the Browns.
(10-13-2019, 04:11 PM)PhilHos Wrote: [ -> ]If I said Zac Taylor has been a crappy HC for the 3rd straight year, are you giving my opinion any credibility?
Sent from my LG-Q710AL using Tapatalk
Because a guy in his 9th year and a guy in his 6th game is so comparable.
(10-13-2019, 04:18 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]But on the flip side, with Dalton's ineffectiveness (being nice here), how could anyone take someone still defending him, seriously?
Who's defending him today though? One guy said he had excellent placement on a couple of passes. Outside of that, who's defended Dalton?
Sent from my LG-Q710AL using Tapatalk
(10-13-2019, 04:15 PM)PhilHos Wrote: [ -> ]The Bengals keep trying to rush up the middle for some reason
Sent from my LG-Q710AL using Tapatalk
Remember back when they used to try and do the shovel pass every play?
For real: Andy's been in the league 9 years and someone said 10 years and that becomes a big deal?
Sorry but when you've yielded 196 on the ground and have allowed 7-11 on third down you are incompetent on defense.
(10-13-2019, 04:20 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]Because a guy in his 9th year and a guy in his 6th game is so comparable.
My point still stands.
Sent from my LG-Q710AL using Tapatalk
(10-13-2019, 04:18 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]But on the flip side, with Dalton's ineffectiveness (being nice here), how could anyone take someone still defending him, seriously?
And then add on ppl
Defending him sit on this board and when they see posts going at Dalton they IGNORE all the football details and focus in on stuff that doesn’t matter like grammar and if they got the number of years he’s played right. Then when asked respectfully to address the meat of the post they dance around it and double down on some inconsequential mistake.
Hard to take them seriously no matter how many rep points they have . Then rep points don’t make you smart it just means you say stuff ppl like
(10-13-2019, 04:19 PM)Synric Wrote: [ -> ]Another week the defense isnt great but not bad either.....but the offense cannot do anything.
Did you watch the first quarter and a 1/2 birds Pretty much did as they pleased. 8 years a play. They are playing better now. But we’re crap almost a 1/2
(10-13-2019, 04:20 PM)PhilHos Wrote: [ -> ]Who's defending him today though? One guy said he had excellent placement on a couple of passes. Outside of that, who's defended Dalton?
Sent from my LG-Q710AL using Tapatalk
New username "One Guy"
(10-13-2019, 03:16 PM)leonardfan40 Wrote: [ -> ]When did he grow all of that hair?
On his palms? Didnt notice.
OMG an end around WORKED! IMAGINE THAT!