(01-01-2017, 05:21 PM)grampahol Wrote: Would I sound like I'm complaining if I said tthis game has gotten boring

no longer boring because of your comment!

(01-01-2017, 05:19 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: As incredibly disappointing and frustrating as the playoff failures have been, it still stinks that we won't be playing next week for the 1st time in 6 years. 

Yes, but the playoff losses have been hard to watch, especially the ones against San Diego and then Pittsburgh last year.

Next year might be good because the schedule will be easier and it might take just a couple of tweaks for the Bengals to turn it around.

The beginning of the end...here we go..

(01-01-2017, 05:20 PM)Mickeypoo Wrote: Yet another game of 2nd half awesomeness by the Bengals and ML. smh

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

"Welp, we hit 20 points boys. Let's call that good."

Carlos Dansby got punked on that play and Derron Smith wasn't even in the same time zone let alone the right position. Playing loose cover-one zone against Joe Flacco will get you burned badly.

(01-01-2017, 05:24 PM)reuben.ahmed Wrote: no longer boring because of your comment!

That's why I did it..for entertainment purposes only. 

Dream scenario coming up...

Ravens get the ball with 1:00 left in the game and drive about 50 yards for a long field goal to tie it at the end of regulation. No one scores and the game ends in a tie. 

The bengals punt on every 2nd half possession. 

Dansby pulled up lame in pursuit.

(01-01-2017, 05:24 PM)BobJones4980 Wrote: Right? I mean who cares if we end up missing on an elite player because we were picking one pick later because we won a meaningless game.

But that would mean the game had some sort of meaning!

Damnit

(01-01-2017, 05:24 PM)Fan_in_Kettering Wrote: Carlos Dansby got punked on that play and Derron Smith wasn't even in the same time zone let alone the right position.  Playing loose cover-one zone against Joe Flacco will get you burned badly.

Playing loose cover zone against any QB in this league will get you killed. It's a QB's dream coverage scenario. I'll never understand why we try to defend leads with this coverage. Too Chuck Bresnahan-ish

Hold em fellas..
Oh well..

(01-01-2017, 05:25 PM)grampahol Wrote: That's why I did it..for entertainment purposes only. 

I like that!  :andy:

(01-01-2017, 05:26 PM)KansasBengal Wrote: Dansby pulled up lame in pursuit.

He did that in week one...

(01-01-2017, 05:26 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: But that would mean the game had some sort of meaning!

Bengals need to go back to Boyd, Core, LaFell, Burkhead....and no more looking at Peerman.....No points in second half after Ravens had no answer for our offense first half.....Still up by 10 , but lets go back to Boyd and others.

Well the Browns suck again

If you look at the really good defenses you virtually never see them in cover or soft zones. If they are in a zone it's a tight one but really man coverage has made a big comeback.

(01-01-2017, 05:26 PM)Pat5775 Wrote: Playing loose cover zone against any QB in this league will get you killed. It's a QB's dream coverage scenario. I'll never understand why we try to defend leads with this coverage. Too Chuck Bresnahan-ish

This is where Mike Zimmer used to bring the pressure and play man coverage.  It clamped down on plays like that and generated more interceptions.

(01-01-2017, 05:28 PM)kevin Wrote: Bengals need to go back to Boyd, Core, LaFell, Burkhead....and no more looking at Peerman.....No points in second half after Ravens had no answer for our offense first half.....Still up by 10 , but lets go back to Boyd and others.

Nope. Too good of an idea. Makes too much sense. Marvin won't allow it to happen