01-01-2017, 05:24 PM
(01-01-2017, 05:21 PM)grampahol Wrote: Would I sound like I'm complaining if I said tthis game has gotten boring
no longer boring because of your comment!
#FIRELOU
***Week 17 GameDay Thread...Ravens @ Bengals***
|
01-01-2017, 05:24 PM
(01-01-2017, 05:21 PM)grampahol Wrote: Would I sound like I'm complaining if I said tthis game has gotten boring no longer boring because of your comment!
#FIRELOU
01-01-2017, 05:24 PM
(01-01-2017, 05:19 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: As incredibly disappointing and frustrating as the playoff failures have been, it still stinks that we won't be playing next week for the 1st time in 6 years. Yes, but the playoff losses have been hard to watch, especially the ones against San Diego and then Pittsburgh last year. Next year might be good because the schedule will be easier and it might take just a couple of tweaks for the Bengals to turn it around.
01-01-2017, 05:24 PM
The beginning of the end...here we go..
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
01-01-2017, 05:24 PM
01-01-2017, 05:24 PM
Carlos Dansby got punked on that play and Derron Smith wasn't even in the same time zone let alone the right position. Playing loose cover-one zone against Joe Flacco will get you burned badly.
01-01-2017, 05:25 PM
(01-01-2017, 05:24 PM)reuben.ahmed Wrote: no longer boring because of your comment! That's why I did it..for entertainment purposes only.
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
01-01-2017, 05:25 PM
Dream scenario coming up...
Ravens get the ball with 1:00 left in the game and drive about 50 yards for a long field goal to tie it at the end of regulation. No one scores and the game ends in a tie. The bengals punt on every 2nd half possession. "The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
01-01-2017, 05:26 PM
Dansby pulled up lame in pursuit.
01-01-2017, 05:26 PM
(01-01-2017, 05:24 PM)BobJones4980 Wrote: Right? I mean who cares if we end up missing on an elite player because we were picking one pick later because we won a meaningless game. But that would mean the game had some sort of meaning!
01-01-2017, 05:26 PM
(01-01-2017, 05:24 PM)Fan_in_Kettering Wrote: Carlos Dansby got punked on that play and Derron Smith wasn't even in the same time zone let alone the right position. Playing loose cover-one zone against Joe Flacco will get you burned badly. Playing loose cover zone against any QB in this league will get you killed. It's a QB's dream coverage scenario. I'll never understand why we try to defend leads with this coverage. Too Chuck Bresnahan-ish
01-01-2017, 05:27 PM
Hold em fellas..
Oh well..
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
01-01-2017, 05:27 PM
(01-01-2017, 05:25 PM)grampahol Wrote: That's why I did it..for entertainment purposes only. I like that! :andy:
#FIRELOU
01-01-2017, 05:27 PM
(01-01-2017, 05:26 PM)KansasBengal Wrote: Dansby pulled up lame in pursuit. He did that in week one...
01-01-2017, 05:28 PM
01-01-2017, 05:28 PM
Bengals need to go back to Boyd, Core, LaFell, Burkhead....and no more looking at Peerman.....No points in second half after Ravens had no answer for our offense first half.....Still up by 10 , but lets go back to Boyd and others.
1968 Bengal Fan
01-01-2017, 05:28 PM
Well the Browns suck again
01-01-2017, 05:29 PM
If you look at the really good defenses you virtually never see them in cover or soft zones. If they are in a zone it's a tight one but really man coverage has made a big comeback.
01-01-2017, 05:29 PM
(01-01-2017, 05:26 PM)Pat5775 Wrote: Playing loose cover zone against any QB in this league will get you killed. It's a QB's dream coverage scenario. I'll never understand why we try to defend leads with this coverage. Too Chuck Bresnahan-ish This is where Mike Zimmer used to bring the pressure and play man coverage. It clamped down on plays like that and generated more interceptions.
01-01-2017, 05:29 PM
(01-01-2017, 05:28 PM)kevin Wrote: Bengals need to go back to Boyd, Core, LaFell, Burkhead....and no more looking at Peerman.....No points in second half after Ravens had no answer for our offense first half.....Still up by 10 , but lets go back to Boyd and others. Nope. Too good of an idea. Makes too much sense. Marvin won't allow it to happen |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|