source

(07-07-2015, 07:57 PM)Devils Advocate Wrote: source

1 what is attractive about a child's body that isn't even developed?  I realize they're sick, but how can they be turned on by children?

2 do these people think that kids aren't going to say anything to anyone?  "This grown man told us to go in this room and get naked, but it was just a game"?

3 why would parents let their children over a grown man's house?  Do people forget a guy named Michael Jackson?  Especially these days, with stories of priests and people that are molesting kids, is there no warning light in parents' heads?

(07-07-2015, 08:14 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: 2 do these people think that kids aren't going to say anything to anyone?  "This grown man told us to go in this room and get naked, but it was just a game"?

It is a complicate psychological game of manipulation.  They convince the kids to do it without threatening them.  That way the child thinks he has done something he has to hide.  If you were to walk in on an adult molesting a child the child will often try to hide what was happening.  He doesn't think he is being "saved".  Instead he thinks he is getting busted along with the adult.

(07-07-2015, 09:33 PM)fredtoast Wrote: It is a complicate psychological game of manipulation.  They convince the kids to do it without threatening them.  That way the child thinks he has done something he has to hide.  If you were to walk in on an adult molesting a child the child will often try to hide what was happening.  He doesn't think he is being "saved".  Instead he thinks he is getting busted along with the adult.

You know an awful lot about this...

Always new he was the devil. Know one eats subway and actually enjoys it.

Wasn't the director of his whole operation/ promotional crew found with child porn? I thought they were doing this just to make sure

(07-08-2015, 01:41 AM)eoxyod Wrote: Wasn't the director of his whole operation/ promotional crew found with child porn? I thought they were doing this just to make sure

The initial story I read said something like "probably related to so-and-so's arrest". It could be nothing. It could be something terrible.

Jared promised the children a foot long, but didn't even deliver a six inch.

(07-08-2015, 01:41 AM)eoxyod Wrote: Wasn't the director of his whole operation/ promotional crew found with child porn? I thought they were doing this just to make sure

yeah all i have seen this is just making sure he didnt have a hand in it, since he had a hand in the foundation or whatever it was

(07-08-2015, 09:00 AM)Beaker Wrote: Jared promised the children a foot long, but didn't even deliver a six inch.

I've got some meatballs in my van.

If he's found guilty of this, he'll be eating a lot more FOOT LONGS in prison. He'll have Bubba's Special Creamy Au Jus sauce with it too. 

This file photo from one of the articles makes it look like he's packing a foot-long in his pants.

You guys aren't right.

(07-07-2015, 08:14 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: 1 what is attractive about a child's body that isn't even developed?  I realize they're sick, but how can they be turned on by children?

2 do these people think that kids aren't going to say anything to anyone?  "This grown man told us to go in this room and get naked, but it was just a game"?

3 why would parents let their children over a grown man's house?  Do people forget a guy named Michael Jackson?  Especially these days, with stories of priests and people that are molesting kids, is there no warning light in parents' heads?

Well he has kids... So kids could be at his house to play with his kids.

2. Wait until he is convicted before beliving he is guilty.

Jared pleading guilty

Link to the Stink

So much for the academic excercise of theorizing about his innocence. On the plus side, somewhere there's a fat guy with a Subway fixation who now can become a star.

(08-18-2015, 10:05 PM)Awful Llama Wrote: So much for the academic excercise of theorizing about his innocence.  On the plus side, somewhere there's a fat guy with a Subway fixation who now can become a star.

I weigh about a buck sixty...can't we just take a picture of me in a fat suit holding a Chumbawamba CD and pretend I lost all that weight at Subway?

(08-18-2015, 10:05 PM)Awful Llama Wrote: So much for the academic excercise of theorizing about his innocence. On the plus side, somewhere there's a fat guy with a Subway fixation who now can become a star.

lol its all the walking that lost the wieght subway is horrible overall lol...

(08-19-2015, 10:07 AM)XenoMorph Wrote: lol its all the walking that lost the wieght  subway is horrible overall lol...

It literally does not matter what you eat.  Eating below your TDEE will always produce loss of weight.  Eat subway all day as long as you eat less calories than you need to maintain your weight.  

Calories in and calories out.

(08-19-2015, 10:40 AM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: It literally does not matter what you eat.  Eating below your TDEE will always produce loss of weight.  Eat subway all day as long as you eat less calories than you need to maintain your weight.  

Calories in and calories out.

You sound like a spokesperson for some weight loss foundation.  Wait a minute.........