No real surprises

[jj22]

(Today, 09:29 AM)CJD Wrote: You never explicitly said the loss is on Burrow, but you did consistently equivocate winning with QB success. You mentioned several times that Joe Burrow is no longer a top 10 QB in 2024. Your top 10 (with one honorable mention) was:

Mahomes

Allen
Hurts
Prescott
Love
Daniels
Stanford
Purdy
Lamar
Goff

Darnold….


This is why people are saying you blamed Burrow for this loss. Because, in a game where Burrow was nearly perfect, you are talking about him no longer being a top 10 QB in the NFL (which is ridiculous), listing guys like Goff, Love, Stanford and Prescott above him.


If you want to say you were just emotionally charged last night and not thinking straight, that's one thing. But you seem to be doubling down on this absurd notion that Burrow's performance last night was an indication that he fell out of the top 10 QBs in the NFL. 


Hence the other members criticizing you.

All this was to the point of another Star QB being born in front of our very eyes. Highlighting that Burrow isn't the apple of the NFL eye anymore. Nothing to do with Burrow or his play. More to do with the influx of star QB's. 2 of which we crowned. 

But look no further to the news this morning. A(nother) NFL Star was born last night. Washington isn't trading him for Burrow. And that's my point. Anyone would take a top 5 QB. Can you mention 10 teams that would keep there's over Burrow.....I can. You need more than a star QB in this league. There are too many of them.

I didn't even mention Rodgers. It's a lot of QB's and folks are stuck in the past stil arguing Burrow is top 5 or yes even 10. And if there is a close comparison then wins do break the tie.

Context matters and if you read the thread (which you did) then you saw me continue to praise the offense and Burrow while blaming the defense for the loss. Why didn't you add that to your post? Everything you posted was in regards to Daniels arrival. If you followed the thread it'd be apparent as it was to most.