07-17-2015, 11:48 AM
(07-16-2015, 03:58 PM)djs7685 Wrote: Actually, I think the best case scenario would be that AJM lights it up in preseason. Then Andy has an Aaron Rodgers-esque season and we're winning by so many points that AJM plays the entire 2nd half in most games and lights it up against 1st string defenses throughout the whole season. We win the Super Bowl with Andy having a 150 passer rating and then we trade AJM for 3 future first round picks right before the draft. He then decides to retire from football (don't want to wish injury on any player) so that team no longer has the great AJ McCarron and we have all of their first round picks for the next few years. Wooo!
But yeah, if McCarron doesn't see the field we're probably in better shape than if he needs to. There are definitely delusional people on both sides of the argument. I see no reason that people wouldn't want him to be good, but I also don't see why people want us to be in position where he'd need to be playing.
1. Has anyone actually said they don't want him to be good? I haven't seen that, I've seen people doubt he will be good or at least want to see him physically able to practice in the NFL first....
2. Because some people seriously think winning at Alabama over the last 4 years was a tough task (EL OH EL) and makes him worthy of a starting gig. Ask people his best qualities and they say how much he won at Bama as one of them.
