Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
PFF Grades vs Carolina
#81
(Yesterday, 05:57 AM)Yogo Wrote: Think we can get a good return to help out our old friends in Tennessee?  Maybe Browning could get us a 4th rounder?

LOL They aren't moving Browning.
Reply/Quote
#82
(Yesterday, 09:11 AM)ochocincos Wrote: Usually PFF because, like I said, I'm noticing/remembering typically maybe a few plays in a game where a player may have performed well or poorly when the ball was in their direction and therefore they showed up on the screen during replay.

PFF goes through every single snap for every single player when they grade them, being able to stop and replay the tape over and over again.

I'm just watching real time on the TV broadcast, drinking beer, and walking away periodically during commercials and some plays.
I don't pay a huge amount of attention and focus on individual players during an entire game.

Maybe you do watch that closely to individual players though all/most snaps though and replay the recorded game for certain snaps.
I don't.
Blasphemy


(9 hours ago)George Cantstandya Wrote: This is why I never cared for PFF.  I get the impression they make their money off people who like to talk football and will just take their word for it.  It seems many other people love PFF when it supports their view but think they are full of it when PFF doesn't support their view.  I wonder if the hardcore gamblers and such that analyze everything NFL take PFF seriously. 

It USED to be football-knowing guys (but still not pros), when people like myself and Eox applied to work for them and Khaled Elsayed did good stuff with implementing the old grading system, but things change and squeezing every penny rears its ugly head.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
[Image: Truck_1_0_1_.png]
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)