We were drafting Gibbs?

[*rfaulk34*]

(11-15-2024, 03:29 PM)Soonerpeace Wrote: Hadn’t heard that but knew we liked him.

Jahmyr Gibbs on the Bengals in the '23 NFL Draft: ?

"Cincinnati was gonna get me. I think they were gonna trade up at like 18 or somewhere around that range".

Via the Richard Sherman Podcast pic.twitter.com/E91zyqAinw

— Bengalscentre (@benga1scentre) November 15, 2024

Woulda coulda shoulda

AAAAAAAAAnd they failed. Way to try hard though Bengals. Here's your trophy!

[SunsetBengal]

(11-15-2024, 09:47 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Woulda coulda shoulda

AAAAAAAAAnd they failed. Way to try hard though Bengals. Here's your trophy!

Meh, they would have put him behind the same OL that they wasted all of Mixon's potential behind..

[*rfaulk34*]

(11-15-2024, 09:51 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Meh, they would have put him behind the same OL that they wasted all of Mixon's potential behind..

Think about what Chase Brown has been able to do and imagine that, more often. Gibbs is the real deal.

[FormerlyBengalRugby]

Gibbs would not have thrived here, and the Bengals are not concerned with the running game, as we see with the o-line, RB, and o-line coach history.

Now if Burrow had a prime Giovani Bernard...

Needs a scat back who can catch and pass block, with some brains...

[Essex Johnson]

(11-15-2024, 07:31 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: I understand your reasoning for thinking that way, but I also have to say that the Bengals are notorious for not paying whatever it takes to attain, or even retain a player that significantly makes their team better. (I could make a long list, but it's Friday evening and I got better things to stuff)

I really think we need to see what plays out, no way am I going to call moving up for Gibbs pick was the better choice ( with trading up and loss of draft picks) vs grabbing Brown late in draft.  Gibbs has performed better but if you measure it by draft value , Brown is ahead in my book at this early point in their careers.

[*rfaulk34*]

(11-15-2024, 05:23 PM)BengalYankee Wrote: Nope not at all!!!




Bengals ...

No one cares about stuff that happened 70 years ago.

[BengalYankee]

(11-16-2024, 05:07 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: No one cares about stuff that happened 70 years ago.

1. What about 56 years ago? 

2. In 2038 will they care about 70 years ago? 

[*rfaulk34*]

(11-16-2024, 07:39 PM)BengalYankee Wrote: 1. What about 56 years ago? 

2. In 2038 will they care about 70 years ago? 

1. No
2. No

[BengalYankee]

(11-16-2024, 07:39 PM)BengalYankee Wrote: 1. What about 56 years ago? 

2. In 2038 will they care about 70 years ago? 

(11-17-2024, 12:50 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: 1. No
2. No

1. Good that means Superbowl 1 means nothing for now.       2024 - 56 years ago = 1968(Super bowl 1)
2. "                                                                           "       2024 - 70 years =       1968(Super bowl 1)

I'm glad you are consistent. 

[THE PISTONS]

I read about us linked to a bunch of players each year.

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(11-15-2024, 03:29 PM)Soonerpeace Wrote: Hadn’t heard that but knew we liked him.

Jahmyr Gibbs on the Bengals in the '23 NFL Draft: ?

"Cincinnati was gonna get me. I think they were gonna trade up at like 18 or somewhere around that range".

Via the Richard Sherman Podcast pic.twitter.com/E91zyqAinw

— Bengalscentre (@benga1scentre) November 15, 2024

He was who I was leaning on as well leading right up to the Draft besides Mims or Byron Murphy who is doing well in Seattle.

Gibbs is a game breaker as we see with the Lions.

[THE PISTONS]

(11-18-2024, 03:03 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: He was who I was leaning on as well leading right up to the Draft besides Mims or Byron Murphy who is doing well in Seattle.

Gibbs is a game breaker as we see with the Lions.

The Lions have a good offensive line too. And a loaded offense in general.

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(11-18-2024, 03:17 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: The Lions have a good offensive line too. And a loaded offense in general.

Yep, put up 52 yesterday lmao!