Tee’s market price (Update: 3 March 25, Tee has been tagged again)

[Frank Booth]

(Yesterday, 05:18 PM)WeezyBengal Wrote: I can't believe Tee fired his agent for this lol

I knew it was going to happen and was saying it was a big mistake by Tee

It actually made me irritated at the whole situation

[c766]

(Yesterday, 06:04 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: I knew it was going to happen and was saying it was a big mistake by Tee

It actually made me irritated at the whole situation

Why would anyone here care if you were personally irritated?  lol 

Get over it? 

[XsandOs]

(Yesterday, 06:04 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: I knew it was going to happen and was saying it was a big mistake by Tee

It actually made me irritated at the whole situation

Mystery solved.

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(Yesterday, 05:46 PM)WeezyBengal Wrote: The plan should be to re-sign Tee and trade Hendrickson. 

Hitting Happy Hour hard? Lol

[Frank Booth]

(Yesterday, 07:18 PM)c766 Wrote: Why would anyone here care if you were personally irritated?  lol 

Get over it? 

somebody cared enough to make a thread about it on here, so I replied

now kick rocks

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(Yesterday, 05:37 PM)wanga Wrote: No it was very much tongue in cheek. I do find it mildly amusing when multi millionaire athletes pledge to ‘keep the team together’. Only as long as it doesn’t come out of their pockets of course. 

Would be a nice dodge for the salary cap though but I’m sure that’s heavily scrutinised at HQ. 

Ah, cool Wanga. It is kind of amusing alright. I know we have to keep Burrow happy, but at what cost? We have to upgrade the trenches
more than pay Tee more than he is worth right when we have to pay Ja'Marr 40 mil per year...

(Yesterday, 05:45 PM)WeezyBengal Wrote: That's kind of my point. He fired his agent for no reason. His last agent would have probably gotten him more money in free agency when he inevitably hits the market. 

Eh, we have no idea if he would of or wouldn't gotten him more money. Doesn't sound like Tee thought he would otherwise he wouldn't of 
fired him in the first place. I know Tee doesn't sound happy about the tag, but it allows the Bengals to extend him on a longer deal and at 
the same time not get screwed over by letting him go for nothing.

And don't say comp picks, comp picks mean nothing as we have never hit on a comp pick that I can remember...

(Yesterday, 05:46 PM)WeezyBengal Wrote: The plan should be to re-sign Tee and trade Hendrickson. 

Hendrickson's stock has never been higher, he's older, and his best production is most likely behind him. 

You will get some crap for this Weezy, but...

This Draft is really deep at DL. I know Trey hasn't shown any fall off yet, but he could this year right after an extension.

Would rather this happen to another team lol

(Yesterday, 05:52 PM)Ell Prez Wrote: Tagging Tee is part of the Bengals leverage. They can negotiate saying, fine if you don’t like the offer you can play on the tag again. The only thing this proved to me was the Bengals truly want to keep tee. Not that I didn’t ever think they didn’t but I believe the plan all along was to tag and then work on a long term deal.

Exactly what I believe whether it is what I would want to do or not. It is what they are doing, no point in arguing with it.

[c766]

(Yesterday, 07:36 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: somebody cared enough to make a thread about it on here, so I replied

now kick rocks

Can you let everyone know the next time you feel personally upset about a NFL players decision on/off the field?

You should let us know every time, lol 

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

Get me some popcorn.

[SunsetBengal]

(Yesterday, 04:18 PM)Bengalbug Wrote: Brady didn’t do it for Evans (WR3), Rodgers didn’t do it for Adams (WR1), Mahomes didn’t do it for Hill (WR2).

HOF WR 1
123 catches -1,553 yards -11TD (probowl, first team all pro)
100 catches - 1,516 yards - 14TD (probowl, first team all pro)

One season he was catching passes from an MVP Super Bowl winning QB, the next was from an Andy Daltonish kind of QB.

HOF WR 2
111 catches - 1,239 yards - 9 TD (Probowl)
119 catches - 1,710 yards - 7 TD (Probowl, first team all pro)

One season he was catching passes from an MVP Super Bowl winning QB, the next was from an Andy Daltonish kind of QB.

HOF WR 3
67 catches - 1,157 yards - 8 TD (Probowl)
70 catches - 1,006 yards - 13 TD

One season he was catching passes from an Andy DaltonishbQB, the next was from an MVP Super Bowl winning QB.

The long time poster whose style you're emulating here typically lets us know who he's talking about at the end of the post...

[Frank Booth]

(Yesterday, 08:00 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Get me some popcorn.  

I will not argue just to spite you, natey boy

[Bengalbug]

(Yesterday, 08:55 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: The long time poster whose style you're emulating here typically lets us know who he's talking about at the end of the post...

I’m not emulating anyone.

Davante Adams (Rodgers-Carr), Tyreek Hill (Mahomes-Tua), Mike Evans (Winston-Brady)

[SunsetBengal]

(Yesterday, 09:52 PM)Bengalbug Wrote: I’m not emulating anyone.

Davante Adams, Tyreek Hill, Mike Evans.

Little late now, should have been included in the post.

[Bengalbug]

(Yesterday, 09:54 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Little late now, should have been included in the post.

No one seemed to care about the facts, at least you did. So thanks.

[007BengalsFan]

(Yesterday, 05:36 PM)J24 Wrote: Adams is 32 years old; why would the Bengals give up on a top 20 WR who is 26 for him?
Also I don't think you would get a 2nd but maybe a 3rd for Tee.

Because even at 32 years old Adams produces more than Higgins.  Adams has had back to back 1000 yard seasons while Tee has spent a lot of time watching games on the sideline.  I will take a 32 year old that is producing every year vs a 26 year old guy that cant stay healthy

[J24]

(Yesterday, 09:57 PM)007BengalsFan Wrote: Because even at 32 years old Adams produces more than Higgins.  Adams has had back to back 1000 yard seasons while Tee has spent a lot of time watching games on the sideline.  I will take a 32 year old that is producing every year vs a 26 year old guy that cant stay healthy

What happens when he fizzles out in a year? Signing a 32 year old player over a 26 year old player is not a smart move.

[SunsetBengal]

(Yesterday, 10:46 PM)J24 Wrote: What happens when he fizzles out in a year? Signing a 32 year old player over a 26 year old player is not a smart move.

Absolutely, and he really hasn't been the same player since he left GB.

[reuben.ahmed]

(Yesterday, 10:51 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Absolutely, and he really hasn't been the same player since he left GB.

I want you to add to your signature, Frank has a lot of good one liners. "now kick rocks" is another to add

[007BengalsFan]

(Yesterday, 10:51 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Absolutely, and he really hasn't been the same player since he left GB.

What?  In the three years since he left Green Bay, Adams has put up 3723 yards with 30 TDs.   In that same time period the last 3 years, Tee has put up 2596 yards with 22 TDs.

[Bengalbug]

(Today, 12:37 AM)007BengalsFan Wrote: What?  In the three years since he left Green Bay, Adams has put up 3723 yards with 30 TDs.   In that same time period the last 3 years, Tee has put up 2596 yards with 22 TDs.

You would need to compare Adams since he left vs Adams when he was in GB.

321 - 3,924 - 34 (GB 2019-2021)
288 - 3,723 - 30 (LV and NYJ 2022-2024)

One caveat is he has played in a handful of more games, the last 3 years v the previous three. But he is also not 26-28, and these were age 29-32 years. Drop off is normal, but he is still a dang good football player.

If you could bring Adams in for 2 years, while concurrently flipping Higgins for players/assets at a potentially discounted contract… I could believe that as a cake and eat it too scenario. If you can’t get value for Tee, I’ll take tee over Adams in a vacuum.

[*Go Cards*]

AJ Green drew double teams every single play.

Chase draws the double teams away from Tee.

Both are amongst the Bengals WR greats but AJ is definitely above Tee on the list imho.