Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is Shemar holding out?
(Yesterday, 10:23 PM)Destro Wrote: Again, it is not about breaking laws. As long as you stay stuck with this, get off of me.


Nothing to do with what I am talking about. 

Yes it does. The clause in the contract isn’t what you think. It doesn’t include simple violations. Your words. The NFLPA would never allow it. The contract would never be approved on a rookie one. So it has everything to do with what you are talking about. Guess again.
Romo “ so impressed with Zac ...1 of the best in the NFL… they are just fundamentally sound. Taylor the best winning % in the Playoffs of current coaches. Joe Burrow” Zac is the best head coach in the NFL & that gives me a lot of confidence." Taylor led the Bengals to their first playoff win since 1990, ending the longest active drought in the four major North American sports, en and appeared in Super Bowl LVI, the first since 1988.

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]


Reply/Quote
(Yesterday, 10:37 PM)007BengalsFan Wrote: That video is interesting.  Russo said 31 NFL teams have the conduct clause in their contracts with the only team not being the Ravens.  Just further proof Stewarts agent was unaware of how other contracts in the NFL are being done.   Horrible job as an agent.

I was told this long ago by someone that absolutely would know.
Romo “ so impressed with Zac ...1 of the best in the NFL… they are just fundamentally sound. Taylor the best winning % in the Playoffs of current coaches. Joe Burrow” Zac is the best head coach in the NFL & that gives me a lot of confidence." Taylor led the Bengals to their first playoff win since 1990, ending the longest active drought in the four major North American sports, en and appeared in Super Bowl LVI, the first since 1988.

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]


Reply/Quote
(Yesterday, 11:18 PM)Soonerpeace Wrote: Yes it does. The clause in the contract isn’t what you think. It doesn’t include simple violations. Your words. The NFLPA  would never allow it. The contract would never be approved on a rookie one. So it has everything to do with what you are talking about. Guess again.

You have no idea what I think it is, so park that idea. "Does not include simple violations" is subjective, as a former Raider, now disagrees what is or is not a enough to void "guaranteed" money. For separate example, missing weight and killing someone are far different things, but where the redline for "simple" my lie for one person may differ from another, say a player than ownership. The "but other teams" or "this agent" still didn't get change get pen to paper until this week.  
Like a teenage girl driving a Ferrari. 
Reply/Quote
(Yesterday, 11:46 PM)Destro Wrote: You have no idea what I think it is, so park that idea. "Does not include simple violations" is subjective, as a former Raider, now disagrees what is or is not a enough to void "guaranteed" money. For separate example, missing weight and killing someone are far different things, but where the redline for "simple" my lie for one person may differ from another, say a player than ownership. The "but other teams" or "this agent" still didn't get change get pen to paper until this week.  

You said simple violations. It’s not. End of story go away and hide
Romo “ so impressed with Zac ...1 of the best in the NFL… they are just fundamentally sound. Taylor the best winning % in the Playoffs of current coaches. Joe Burrow” Zac is the best head coach in the NFL & that gives me a lot of confidence." Taylor led the Bengals to their first playoff win since 1990, ending the longest active drought in the four major North American sports, en and appeared in Super Bowl LVI, the first since 1988.

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]


Reply/Quote
(11 hours ago)Soonerpeace Wrote: You said simple violations. It’s not. End of story go away and hide

You still as functional as ever.
Like a teenage girl driving a Ferrari. 
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 18 Guest(s)