Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Trey Hendrickson Update
(6 hours ago)PhilHos Wrote: I'd have more sympathy for Trey's side of things if he didn't complain about his contract last year when the Bengals could literally do nothing to rectify his issues. If he's worried about respect, where is his apology to the Bengals for making a stink about his contract last year when they couldn't do anything about it?

Not that this absolves the front office for any disrespect on their part, but kinda makes Trey look a little hypocritcal, no?

Trey did come in after that unfortunate incident and said a lot of the right things. I don't remember an apology though.
Reply/Quote
(6 hours ago)Luvnit2 Wrote: This is not true. Milton Williams signed a 104 million contract, yet only 51 million is guaranteed at signing. That is less than 50% guaranteed money. This is closer to te norm in the NFL, the Bengals follow the norm, they are not doing less than other teams.If you take total guarntees, it i still only 63 million.

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/player/_/id/72453/milton-williams

Contract Terms:

4 yr(s) / $104,000,000
Average Salary:
$26,000,000
Signing Bonus:
$24,000,000
GTD at Sign:

$51,000,000
Total GTD:
$63,000,000
Free Agent:
2029 / UFA

DE Sweat signed with Cardinals in 2025.
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/player/_/id/29061/montez-sweat

Contract Terms:

4 yr(s) / $98,000,000
Average Salary:
$24,500,000
Signing Bonus:
$20,426,000
GTD at Sign:

$41,964,888
Total GTD:
$62,864,888
Free Agent:
2028 / UFA

Why were these players nit insulted by the low guaranntees, 2 top players who signed quickly in 2025 FA?




Milton Williams is the only Free Agent DT making more guaranteed money in 2025 than BJ Hill although 5 different defensive tackles signed bigger contracts.

This is an example of how the Bengals do contracts different. Just like they could have lowered the early years of Chase and Tee and fit more short term players on the roster.

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
(3 hours ago)Synric Wrote: Milton Williams is the only Free Agent DT making more guaranteed money in 2025 than BJ Hill although 5 different defensive tackles signed bigger contracts.

This is an example of how the Bengals do contracts different. Just like they could have lowered the early years of Chase and Tee and fit more short term players on the roster.

I suggest you look athe percent guaranteed versus the dollar amount. You will find the NFL more often than not using the same or similar methods the Bengals use.

As for Chase and Tee, yes they could have done it and kicked the can down the road. But they decided they had a plan that extra cap space in 2025 to push into future years would not be needed.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
 Please use 2025 free agency to fix the trenches, not the draft!!!!!!!!
Reply/Quote
The Ravens just extended 31-year-old RB Derrick Henry 2 years $30 million with $25 million GTD

A RB who is 31 is a lot older in football years than a DE at 30
 
All hopes turn to next year




Reply/Quote
Why didn't the Bengals extend Trey Hendrickson?
As with a lot of these, it's important to note that they still might do something. The Bengals have worked on finding common ground with last season's NFL sack leader (17.5) on a contract extension this offseason. But unlike wide receivers Ja'Marr Chase and Tee Higgins, who got big extensions in March, Hendrickson is still waiting on a deal.

Bengals executive vice president Katie Blackburn told reporters at the owners meetings in March that Hendrickson "should be happy at certain rates that maybe he doesn't think he'd be happy at," which certainly indicates that the team and the player still don't see eye to eye on his value. Hendrickson called the comments "a little disappointing." He took his frustrations public again this week, telling ESPN's Adam Schefter there has been no communication from the team on this since before the draft.

Historically, the Bengals have refused to put future-year guarantees in veteran contracts. Ironically, this is the main reason Hendrickson became a Bengal in the first place. During free agency in 2021, Cincinnati tried bringing back edge rusher Carl Lawson, but he left for the Jets because they guaranteed second-year money. Cincinnati instead signed Hendrickson because he was OK with its contract structure.

The Bengals' long-held rule was to guarantee no money outside of the first year -- specifically, the signing bonus. They broke this rule for quarterback Joe Burrow a couple of years ago and broke it again this year for Chase and Higgins. I don't know for a fact that future-year guarantees are the holdup in Hendrickson's deal, but it's a fair assumption to make based on what I've heard from sources.

And if you're wondering why it would be a holdup for Hendrickson when it wasn't for Burrow, Chase and Higgins, the answer is age. Burrow, Chase and Higgins were all 26 years old at the time of their contract extensions. Hendrickson is 30. For a team that absolutely hates to guarantee money in future years, it's a lot easier to diverge from those principles if said years are the player's age-27 and -28 seasons, rather than his age-31 and -32 years.

There's still a decent chance Hendrickson ends up on the Bengals' 2025 roster. But it has been ugly getting there so far, and it appears there's a decent chance this could end in a training camp holdout. He said Tuesday that he won't play for the Bengals this season under his current contract, so something has to give.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/45127336/2025-nfl-offseason-10-teams-questions-explaining-missed-moves
Reply/Quote
(8 hours ago)THE PISTONS Wrote: Well, we haven't made the playoffs with him getting 17.5 sacks each of the past 2 years.

I still don't know that we have a playoff defense. It may be slightly better personnel wise. We're putting A LOT of pressure on the coaches.


(8 hours ago)THE PISTONS Wrote: Well, we haven't made the playoffs with him getting 17.5 sacks each of the past 2 years.

I still don't know that we have a playoff defense. It may be slightly better personnel wise. We're putting A LOT of pressure on the coaches.

If our HOF billion dollar offense can't win the SB without him, we have to admit he hold more than 0 cards here.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
(2 hours ago)pally Wrote: The Ravens just extended 31-year-old RB Derrick Henry 2 years $30 million with $25 million GTD

A RB who is 31 is a lot older in football years than a DE at 30

He didn't fall off last year, we will see if this was a good move or not. That is a lot of money for a RB at his age, I don't care how much money 
he spends taking care of himself.
1
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)