Attorney: 'Busty' teen kicked out of class for wearing this outfit

[hollodero]

(09-14-2017, 07:28 PM)Millhouse Wrote: Raise your hand if you looked at that girl's boobs on purpose? Thats what I thought ya buncha pervs.

I only opened the thread for that exact purpose. 

I'm afraid these aren't the only boobs that leave me disappointed tonight.

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(09-14-2017, 08:40 PM)Benton Wrote: Well, it's relevant to the story... soooo. 


Do you know of any schools that let guys walk around with their dongs out?



I can't imagine telling my son "Dude, you're showing too much dong. Change into some longer shorts."

Poor family genes?  

[Benton]

(09-14-2017, 08:50 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: But, you certainly would be a proud papa, if you did have to have that talk. 

I dunno. I would hope my kid would know not to walk around with his dong out.

(09-15-2017, 09:47 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Poor family genes?  

He's adopted, so my awesome genes (and giant dong genes) have to transfer through osmosis. Luckily, I'm so awesome that just being in a room makes everyone else there permanently 2% more awesome.

[Sociopathicsteelerfan]

A friend of mine, who was a complete stick figure in junior high btw, had full D's by our senior year. She would occasionally wear a corset top to school. Your senior year you could leave campus for lunch, I walked her to her 5th period class the first time she wore it, when she walked in the teacher inadvertently blurted out, "Oh my god!"

She didn't get sent home.

[*michaelsean*]

So are we sure it was the shirt and not the jeans? Those are not complimenting her body.

[StLucieBengal]

(09-14-2017, 05:47 PM)Au165 Wrote: Welp we were so close, but now back to normal.

Don't worry you are coming around. It won't be much longer

[SunsetBengal]

(09-15-2017, 10:26 AM)Benton Wrote: I dunno. I would hope my kid would know not to walk around with his dong out.


He's adopted, so my awesome genes (and giant dong genes) have to transfer through osmosis. Luckily, I'm so awesome that just being in a room makes everyone else there permanently 2% more awesome.

In support of Harrambe, of course.  

[GMDino]

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/09/16/dress-wearing-students-must-submit-photos-before-dances-wisconsin-high-school-says/673292001/

Quote:‘Dress-wearing’ students must submit photos before dances, Wisconsin high school says

USA TODAY NETWORKAnnysa Johnson, Milwaukee Journal SentinelPublished 7:01 a.m. ET Sept. 16, 2017



(Photo: 3bugsmom, Getty Images/iStockphoto)

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDINCOMMENTEMAILMORE
PEWAUKEE, Wis. — A school district in Wisconsin is requiring all "dress-wearing" students and guests to send photos of their attire before they can buy tickets to its homecoming dance next month.

The Pewaukee High School policy, an extension of the Pewaukee School District's dress code, is aimed at keeping students from being ejected from the event for showing too much skin, according to Pewaukee Superintendent Mike Caty. And it's not new. It's been around since January 2015.

But a reminder emailed to families on Tuesday has some students and parents chafing at the requirement, calling it sexist and micromanaging. And it comes as girls and women nationally are pushing back at dress codes they see as body-shaming and directed almost exclusively at the female body.

"The girls are essentially being held responsible for the wayward thoughts (administrators) think boys have," said Rebecca Shepherd, whose daughter is a freshman at Pewaukee this year.

"They're being told, 'You are the problem,' " she said. "These are the roots of rape culture, frankly."

Caty said the policy isn't sexist. The dress code includes items that appear to be directed at boys; for example, students can't wear low-hanging pants that expose their underwear or behinds. But he said it was girls who forced the district to impose the pre-dance check by pushing the boundaries of appropriate attire at school formals.

"It's really out of a sensitivity to our students," Caty said. "We want (school dances) to be a positive experience. We don't want anyone to show up and have to be sent home because of a dress-code violation."

Dress codes have been around for years; most districts have one. But they have become increasingly controversial in recent years — and not just those directed at young people or girls.

This spring, a female journalist was barred from interviewing lawmakers in a chamber outside the House of Representatives because her dress was sleeveless. The uproar prompted House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Janesville) to announce this month that the code, which also bans open-toed shoes, would be "modernized."

And in June, about 30 boys at a British prep school donned uniform skirts to protest its no-shorts policy that left them sweltering during a summer heat wave, according to the Guardian.

But much of the attention has been on school policies that appear to disproportionately affect girls. Teens are taking to social media to air their grievances, including boys who in some cases have posted photos of themselves in dresses to make their points.

And there have been hundreds of petitions filed on the website change.org aimed at forcing school districts to revamp their policies. Some districts have responded, revising policies to eliminate language that could be seen as sexist or discriminatory against any student, including those who are transgender or gender-non-conforming.

The Pewaukee dress code, like many others, prohibits clothes deemed too revealing. It explicitly bans "tops that have spaghetti straps, are backless, and/or that cover only one shoulder ... blouses that do not cover the midriff" and requires shorts and skirts to "extend below the mid-thigh."

Pewaukee's pre-dance policy appears unusual, if not unique, in southeastern Wisconsin, based on a quick survey of districts on Friday. A Minnesota school rescinded a similar policy in February, a day after it was announced, because of blowback. In that case, girls were told they should wear dresses they would "feel comfortable wearing to a formal event at your church."

As is typical it's the adult who have a problem with it because they are "protecting" the children from seeing someone's shoulders or *gasp* some bosoms.

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(09-16-2017, 09:50 AM)GMDino Wrote: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/09/16/dress-wearing-students-must-submit-photos-before-dances-wisconsin-high-school-says/673292001/



As is typical it's the adult who have a problem with it because they are "protecting" the children from seeing someone's shoulders or *gasp* some bosoms.

My opinion on the specific matter aside, isn't that SUPPOSED to be typical? It's called parenthood, it's kind of their job/responsibility until the child becomes an adult.

I'm not sure why you're making a big deal over parents parenting. I guess because they're not parenting how YOU want them to, thus it's wrong.

[GMDino]

(09-16-2017, 11:28 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: My opinion on the specific matter aside, isn't that SUPPOSED to be typical? It's called parenthood, it's kind of their job/responsibility until the child becomes an adult.

I'm not sure why you're making a big deal over parents parenting. I guess because they're not parenting how YOU want them to, thus it's wrong.

Except it's not the parents...it's some school official trying to make a single rule to cover all things in multiple schools based on....uh....skin?

If PARENTS want to enforce their own dress codes more power to them.

If some parent says they won't let their son go to a school dance because some girl might have a dress on that does NOT go to at least her fingertips when held at her side then that is on them.

Otherwise it's just more puritanical BS from the schools.

[Millhouse]

(09-15-2017, 11:07 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: A friend of mine, who was a complete stick figure in junior high btw, had full D's by our senior year.  She would occasionally wear a corset top to school.  Your senior year you could leave campus for lunch, I walked her to her 5th period class the first time she wore it, when she walked in the teacher inadvertently blurted out, "Oh my god!"

She didn't get sent home.  

My girlfriend in high school had dd's yet was small petite too. Friends would rib me at football practice, god I used to get so pissed back then over it, now I laugh lol. But she wore outfits that were at times more revealing than this girl, never sent home. This was back in 90's.

On a side note and I dont mean to be mean, but I doubt many dudes in that school were checking this girl out. I mean, just sayin through my old high school eyes.

[StLucieBengal]

Back when parents made sure their daughters didn't wear over specialized dresses this was never a problem.

Now you can't even but a simple Halloween costume without it being sexy.

[Belsnickel]

(09-17-2017, 08:17 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Back when parents made sure their daughters didn't wear over specialized dresses this was never a problem.

Now you can't even but a simple Halloween costume without it being sexy.

And whatever happened to men wearing trousers and a collared shirt when they were out? Jeans and t-shirts? Those are meant only for manual labor, not for running around town! I am calling for men to stop dressing like slobs, as well!

[StLucieBengal]

(09-17-2017, 08:47 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: And whatever happened to men wearing trousers and a collared shirt when they were out? Jeans and t-shirts? Those are meant only for manual labor, not for running around town! I am calling for men to stop dressing like slobs, as well!

Agreed.

[GMDino]

(09-17-2017, 08:17 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Back when parents made sure their daughters didn't wear over specialized dresses this was never a problem.  

Now you can't even but a simple Halloween costume without it being sexy.

(09-17-2017, 10:57 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Agreed.

Two things:

1) That is why I said it is up to the PARENTS to decide how to dress their children...not the school board.

2) Every time I read a post about how it "used to be" I picture the poster this way:

[Belsnickel]

(09-17-2017, 11:05 AM)GMDino Wrote: Two things:

1) That is why I said it is up to the PARENTS to decide how to dress their children...not the school board.

2) Every time I read a post about how it "used to be" I picture the poster this way:

Abe Simpson is my goal for geriatric life.

[GMDino]

(09-17-2017, 11:07 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: Abe Simpson is my goal for geriatric life.

Why did you add the " " ?

[StLucieBengal]

(09-17-2017, 11:05 AM)GMDino Wrote: Two things:

1) That is why I said it is up to the PARENTS to decide how to dress their children...not the school board.

2) Every time I read a post about how it "used to be" I picture the poster this way:

This is why I am a supporter of uniforms and further more single sex classrooms/schools.

[GMDino]

(09-17-2017, 03:23 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: This is why I am a supporter of uniforms and further more single sex classrooms/schools.

Why would a "libertarian" want the school district deciding what is best for their children?

[Dill]

(09-14-2017, 02:56 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I don't know any district where that collar would be an issue. There's no cleavage exposed. 

It would also be a poor use of the administrative team to walk around and police trivial policies. 

Agreed. I could understand, maybe, if there were cleavage shown or the fit somehow emphasized the girls breasts. But that's a very ordinary, unspectacular top. If the teacher said what she is alleged to have said, then she has a problem which she is projecting on her students.