Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(08-15-2015, 12:18 PM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote: No, I don't get it.
You're injecting an argument that I never made and argued against that. That's the very definition of strawman.
A strawman is claiming you said something that you did not.
All I said was that you have never mentioned it at all.
That is called "making a point", not a "strawman argument"
Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(08-15-2015, 12:20 PM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote: Maybe you can highlight my personal attack.
(08-15-2015, 11:11 AM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote:
It seems to me that you're the type of person that's had arguments with the Fox News watching, GOP-loving conservatives in the past, and rather than arguing with me over the points that I make, project whatever nonsense you've been told in the past as though I personally said any of those things.
Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(08-15-2015, 12:18 PM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote: We were discussing social welfare programs here. If you can't stick on topic and make a solid point without the insertion of strawmen, then perhaps political discourse and debate is out of your domain.
We have been discussing a broad spectrum of topics regarding the waste of taxpayer money. Go back and look at how this conversation started.
Since you have been crying endlessly about how foodstamp recipients are driving you crazy when they buy soda i thought It would be proper to point out that you have been completely silent about corporate welfare and fraud costing you thousands of times more than foodstamp recipients.
Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(08-15-2015, 12:37 PM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote: I don't see a personal attack there.
Exactly.
Thanks for proving my point.